Hi,
For the final image I used my usual, "Up to"
OK, I had a few minutes last week, and decided to check
out CraigsList and"see whats goin on". I used to find some
work of of C/L, but for the last year or so it seems to be
a haven for wannabees and scammers, but it's interesting
and sometimes there's something worthwhile.
Anyway, one of the postings was for somebody looking for
a student, intern or someone with a "good camera" to take
a series of product photos of power toools.
I replied, and said that while I wasn't a student or intern,
I was a professional, my prices are competetive, and that
I have been shooting products for many years, and directed
her to my website (tricky how I sneaked in those blue letters, huh)
to see some of my work.
Well, this "Self professed advertising & packaging guru, expert and
bon-vivant" (who sounded like she was 12) responded since this
was ONLY for the PACAKGING professional photographs WEREN'T
NECESSARY, since people only throw away the packaging anyway,
and well, they're JUST tools after all.
Can you beleive this.
Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent annually by major corps.
to design, photograph, refine, test, study and otherwise tweak
packaging so that it makes the most impact within it's segment.
But this person knows better, and all she needs is a good camera
for the packaging photos.
Well, I did a test. For image # 1, I took a "good camera" one of my
older, mid-range Digital Single Lens Reflex (DSLR) cameras, approx.
10 MegaPixels, and took a product from one of my clients, and
shot it on a piece of white paper, using only the built-in
Here's the result, basic, but shot with a
"good camera." The sad part, is that this is
accepteble to many people that just don't
know any better.
Now, for the fun part.
Since I shoot a lot of tools like this for the South
American Division of some major tool
companies, I like to think I kinda know what I
I'm doing. I shoot almost all of the basic images
as "silos" on a white background so that they
can be put on other backgrounds as needed.
This next shot shows the basic rig I use for
suspending the drill, which allows me a lot
more flexability in lighting and angle.
(they're VERY specific about the angle)
Now, this rig is something I have to set-up, and
varies depending on what I'm shooting. But it does
take a bit of knowledge and some time to set it up.
The next shot shows the overall set up with the
tabletop set, the camera, computer and some
of the lighting. If you look closely at the monitor,
you can see the drill.
Now, here's where we "deviate somewhat"
I have been doing this for a looooong time.
I'm not a "student or intern", so I can make use
of what I have available.
Most "students or interns" are not going to have
the equipment I have. Not unless Mom & Dad
are very well off.
For the final image I used my usual, "Up to"
49 MegaPixel (yes Martha, 49MP, and it's not
available at Brands Mart) equivalent, digital
scan back, and approx. 4500 watts of
continuous lighting. (yes, thats 4500 watts,
my electric meter is whirling like a dervish)
Here's a version of the final delivered image.
It was a 65 Mb file, at 300dpi, and will be
appearing on South American packaging soon.
As far as image quality, there's no comparison.
While I may not have convinced the woman I was
e-mailing with, fortunately, I have a great group
of clients that know the difference, and can appreciate
the difference.
I saved her e-mail address, and I'm going to send her a link to this blog post.
I'll let you know if anything happens..
Till next time. As my Dad always said, If you can't be good, ya gotta
be good at it !
C-ya